The Craft of Research, Fourth Edition (Chicago Guides to Writing, Editing, and Publishing) book
Preface: The Aims of This Edition 论文写作 Our Debts
note 跟读者建立联系 永远要知道你的读者是谁,他们想要知道什么; 读者知道什么了,他们接下来想要知道什么。 整个论文的写作,就是跟你的读者的一个无声的交流。 跟正常的交流不一样的是说,他不是互动的,而说你要一开始就想好,整个交流应该是一个什么的过程,要想清楚读者是谁,他们需要什么。 所以你在写文章时,而写的能满足他们的需求,使得他们能信服你写的东西。
研究是什么: Gather information to answer a question that solves a problem.
写作的好处: We write to remember more accurately, understand better, and evaluate what we think more objectively. 写作使我们,记得更加精确,理解更好以及评估我们的想法是不是客观的。
论文格式,是同行交流的一个协议。
Write is Thinking Writing a research report is, finally, thinking with and for your readers. If instead you find a topic that you care about, ask a question that you want to answer.
需要为读者思考:去想自己的受众要去怎么样去理解这些东西,他们会怎么去想; 写作的核心在于,要找到一个 topic(自己真正关心的问题,并且自己真的想去回答的问题,就是说去找到自己的兴趣点在哪)。
为你自己和读者都创建一个角色。 Research counts for little if few read it. Yet even experienced researchers sometimes forget to keep their readers in mind as they plan and draft their report. In this chapter we show you how to think about readers even before you begin your project.
读书或读论文时其实是跟作者的无声交流,写作也一样,是将自己的“声音” 写进文字里。 Writing is an imagined conversation. once we decide what role to play and what role to assign to readers, those roles are fixed.
作者的角色有三种:
当作者扮演不同的角色的时候,读者也会得到对应的角色。 读者的角色也有三种:
没有找准读者的角色,可能会造成读者反馈: I don't care.
Think about your readers from the start, knowing that you’ll understand them better as you work through your project. Answer these questions early on, then revisit them when you start planning and again when you revise.
Who will read my report? 我们的读者是谁?谁会读我们的文章。
What do they expect me to do? Should I 他们希望我来干什么事情。
How much can I expect them to know already? 理解一下你的读者的知识的储备。
How will readers respond to the solution /answer in my main claim? 要预测读者对你的回答以及方法做的反馈。
整个论文的写作,就是跟你的读者的一个无声的交流。 跟正常的交流不一样的是说,他不是互动的,而说你要一开始就想好,整个交流应该是一个什么的过程,要想清楚读者是谁,他们需要什么。 所以你在写文章时,而写的能满足他们的需求,使得他们能信服你写的东西。
For some of you, though, the invitation to join this conversation may still seem easy to decline. If you accept it, you’ll have to find a good question, search for sound data, formulate and support a good answer, and then write it all up. Even if you turn out a first-rate report, it may be read not by an eager world but only by your teacher.
And, besides, you may think, my teacher knows all about my topic. What do I gain from writing up my research, other than proving I can do it?
One answer is that we write not just to share our work, but to improve it before we do.
Experienced researchers first write just to remember what they’ve read. A few talented people can hold in mind masses of information, but most of us get lost when we think about what Smith found in light of Wong’s position, and compare both to the odd data in Brunelli, especially as they are supported by Boskowitz — but what was it that Smith said? When you don’t take notes on what you read, you’re likely to forget or, worse, misremember it.
A second reason for writing is to see larger patterns in what you read. When you arrange and rearrange the results of your research in new ways, you discover new implications, connections, and complications. Even if you could hold it all in mind, you would need help to line up arguments that pull in different directions, plot out complicated relationships, sort out disagreements among experts. I want to use these claims from Wong, but her argument is undercut by Smith’s data. When I put them side by side, I see that Smith ignores this last part of Wong’s argument. Aha! If I introduce it with this part from Brunelli, I can focus on Wong more clearly. That’s why careful researchers never put off writing until they’ve gathered all the data they need: they write from the beginning of their project to help them assemble their information in new ways.
A third reason to write is to get your thoughts out of your head and onto paper, where you’ll see what you really can think. Just about all of us, students and professionals alike, believe our ideas are more compelling in the dark of our minds than they turn out to be in the cold light of print. You can’t know how good your ideas are until you separate them from the swift and muddy flow of thought and fix them in an organized form that you — and your readers — can study.
In short, we write to remember more accurately, understand better, and evaluate what we think more objectively. (And as you will discover, the more you write, the better you read.)
Writing a research report is, finally, thinking with and for your readers. When you write for others, you disentangle your ideas from your memories and wishes, so that you — and others — can explore, expand, combine, and understand them more fully. Thinking for others is more careful, more sustained, more insightful — in short, more thoughtful — than just about any other kind of thinking.
You can, of course, take the easy way: do just enough to satisfy your teacher. This book will help you do that, but you’ll shortchange yourself if you do. If instead you find a topic that you care about, ask a question that you want to answer, then pursue that answer as best you can, your project can have the fascination of a mystery whose solution richly rewards your efforts. Nothing contributes more to successful research than your commitment to it, and nothing teaches you more about how to think than a successful (or even unsuccessful) report of its product.
We wish we could tell you how to balance your belief in the worth of your project with the need to accommodate the demands of teachers and colleagues, but we cannot. If you believe in what you’re doing and cannot find anyone else who shares your beliefs, all you can do is put your head down and press on. With our admiration.
Some of the world’s most important research has been done by those who persevered in the face of indifference or even hostility, because they never lost faith in their vision. The geneticist Barbara McClintock struggled for years unappreciated because her research community considered her work uninteresting. But she believed in it and pressed on. When her colleagues finally realized that she had already answered questions that they were just starting to ask, she won science’s highest honor, the Nobel Prize.
note 关于是 怎么样去问问题,怎么样去找答案。
你先找到大小合适的话题,然后问一些问题,然后把一个读者认为值得去了解答案的问题抽出来,做成一个研究问题。
研究问题可能是实际的也可能是概念上的,那不管是哪类问题,你都要想清楚,一它的状况是什么,二不解决它的话,它的后果是什么,但后面两节是说给一个问题的时候,你怎么样找到。资源就是找到前面的工作,然后怎么样读懂别人的工作,以及把你的工作放在别人的工作之上。
就是话题、问题以及它的后果。
A topic is an approach to a subject, one that asks a question whose answer solves a problem that your readers care about.
Even so, once you have a question that holds your interest, you must pose a tougher one about it: So what?
At that point, you have posed a problem that they recognize needs a solution.
note 怎么样讲一个故事(怎么样提一个论点,怎么样安排论据来支撑你的论点)。
note 怎么样把这个故事给你写下来(关于写作主要在这个部分)。